I think Kaprow's main argument is that you can make relatively anything into art. However in Duchamp's readymade, art could consist of inanimate objects, but in Kaprow's case, it is all about the action, or as our class focused on the other day, the "verb." It got me thinking of numerous activities that people do that could very well be considered art and result in very cool art pieces. For instance, someone dribbling a basketball could be considered art. When the ball goes behind their back, in between the legs, in the air, switched from hand to hand..etc. All of these creative intricate moves are pleasing for the eye to look at. It could in turn be made into a cool art piece such as if the ball was covered in different colors of wet paint, and the person still did all of the fancy moves. With each dribble, a new spot of color would form, and it would result in a very colorful abstract piece with a pretty nifty background story as to how it was made.